CannotEnterFinalizationTransientException On Exchange Move Request

Posted on Leave a commentPosted in error, exchange, exchange online, Exchange Server, migration, move

Did not find a lot on the internet on this particular error, so I guess it does not happen very often, but in my case it delayed to move of the mailbox in question by a week or so until I could resolve it.

When a mailbox is moving to a different Exchange organization (cross-forest or to/from Exchange Online) the move process copies the mailbox data to the target database and then right at the end of the move updates Active Directory in both the source and target forest. In the source it changes the object type from mailbox to mailuser (or remotemailbox if Exchange Online is in play, though this is really a special form of mailuser) and in the target, updates the mailuser to become a mailbox.

This particular error occurs at this stage. The Get-MoveRequest cmdlet reports Failed as the status, and Get-MoveRequestStatistics reports FailedOther as the status. If you get the move logs (Get-MoveRequestStatistics <name> -IncludeReport | FL | Out-File <filename.txt>) then in the logs you will see CannotEnterFinalizationTransientException as the error repeated many times until the move fails.

The fix for this issue is as follows:

1. Check that the Exchange System account has permission to the Active Directory object in question. In Active Directory Users and Computers choose View > Advanced to enable the Security tab and then view the security tab on the object in question. Edit > Advanced and then check or click “Enable Inheritance” option or button (depending upon version of AD tools). If inheritance is already set to enabled there is probably no harm in disabling inheritance, copying permissions and then enabling inheritance again.

2. Move the mailbox to a different database in the source Exchange Organization (New-MoveRequest <name>) and waiting for that to complete.

3. Removing and restarting the move in the target forest. If you do not remove and restart the move in the target you will see both MailboxIsNotInExpectedMDBPermanentException and SourceMailboxAlreadyBeingMovedTransientException. The first of these is because the mailbox is not where the target move expects it to be, and the second of these is becuase the source is currently being moved and so cannot be moved to the correct target forest at the same time.

This should resolve your ultimate move request – it did for me! 

Exchange Server Object ID Error With Windows Server 2016 Domain Controllers

Posted on Leave a commentPosted in 2010, 2013, 2016, active directory, ADDS, error, Exchange Server

Saw this error the other day:


When you open Exchange Control Panel and view the Mailbox Delegation tab of any user account you get the following:

The object <name> has been corrupted, and it’s in an inconsistent state. The following validation errors happened: The access control entry defines the ObjectType ‘9b026da6-0d3c-465c-8bee-5199d7165cba’ that can’t be resolved..

You do not see this error on any mailboxes that you have moved to Office 365 in hybrid mode, that is you do not see it on any RemoteMailbox objects.

The issue is because ObjectType ‘9b026da6-0d3c-465c-8bee-5199d7165cba’ is the GUID of the DS-Validated-Write-Computer Control Access Right introduced in WS2016 AD DS which is new to your Active Directory upon installing your first 2016 domain controller. Exchange Server reads this access control list when you open the Mailbox Delegation tab in Exchange Control Panel or when you run Get-ADPermission on the mailbox. This error is cosmetic, but to remove it you just need to reboot all your Exchange Servers in turn (relying on your database availability groups and load balancers to maintain service). Once you have rebooted each server, the error goes away when you are connected to that server for administrative functions. There is no impact on user connectivity whilst this error is in place, though it may impact you ability to assign permissions without error.

Therefore recommend that you reboot one server as soon as you can and then use that server as your target for administration until you can reboot the remaining servers.

Slow Virtualization Networking

Posted on 1 CommentPosted in error, ip, ipv4, networking, virtualisation

I had a complaint from a customer today that there new virtual server with lots of resources was too slow on copying files and could I take a look.

So I did! The virtual server was connected to a 1GB switch via two different network cables. One was configured in the Hyper-V virtualization software as available for the guest and one for the host. In the host I could copy a test file across the network from a file server at close to the expected speed for the network:


Copying the same file from inside a virtual machine on that same host was considerably slower:


Notice the speeds. 85.3 MB/s compared to 355 KB/s!!!

I tried a tracert to the same file server. From the host I got  1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  fileserver.domain.local[] but from the guest I got   1    <200 ms    <201 ms    <38 ms  fileserver.domain.local[]. Every host to file server tracert had a latency in excess of what I expect of some of the internet!

So how to fix…

On the host I checked which physical network card was being used by the Hyper-V guest (Virtual Switch Manager in the Hyper-V tools) and found it was Broadcom NetXtreme Gigabit Network #4 in this case. So in the host I brought up the properties of that same network card (Network and Sharing Center > Change adapter settings > and hover over each NIC to see the hardware description).


Bring up the properties of this network card and click Configure to bring up the configuration of the network card hardware for this specific NIC.

Change to the Advanced tab and select Virtual Machine Queues. Change this to Disabled.


Click OK. The network card will reset and come back online in about 3 to 5 seconds. The guest machine will be offline for this time as well. If you are changing the network card that the host uses as well, you will be disconnected from the host for this time as well (though you will be warned about this in the Hyper-V management tools).

Results when I connected to the guest again:


Now this is half the speed of the host – and I did not find on this machine other network settings to improve this, so I guess this is the impact of using virtualization over physical machines.


Posted on Leave a commentPosted in 2003, 2007, active directory, error, exchange, kerberos, virtual pc, virtual server

This rather imposing message is found if you try to force replication between to Active Directory Domain Controllers when one of the controllers machine account password is out of sync with the password as stored on the other domain controller.

I have seen this a number of times on Virtual PC or Virtual Server Active Directory deployments with more than one DC in the virtual environment.

So, how do you fix it:

  1. On the DC that is broken (the one that when using replmon reports the error above) set the Kerberos Key Distribution Center Service to manual and stop the service.
  2. From a command prompt on the broken DC enter the following:
    netdom resetpwd /s:name_of_working_DC /ud:domain\user /pd:*
    where domain\user is an administrator of the domain in the domain_name\user_name format. You will be prompted to enter your password.
  3. Upon pressing Enter, if the command fails then restart the broken DC and repeat the above command (this restart clears the Kerberos ticket cache and so clears the broken credential attempts that it has stored).
  4. Upon successful completion of the command in step 2 restart the broken DC. You must do this even if done already in step 3.
  5. Check that replication is working, and if so restart the Kerberos Key Distribution Center Service and set the service back to automatic.

This is a summary of Microsoft Knowledgebase Article 325850, with some more specific detail mentioned.